{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/695d5c48154465cd6010f4b3/695d5c648e6dd12efb08f059?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"We Need to Argue With Each Other","description":"<p>On today’s episode of Hear Me Out… host Celeste Headlee introduces Slate’s newest podcast with a question: what if we could argue with each other without hating the results? </p><p><br></p><p><a href=\"https://hughbreakey.com/\">Hugh Breakey</a>, writer and moral philosopher, thinks it’s possible. He and Celeste discuss the case for arguing with each other on difficult topics, and giving up the idea that every argument needs a winner. It’s not just a good idea, according to Breakey — it’s a moral imperative.</p><p><br></p><p>Podcast production by Maura Currie</p><p><em>You can skip all the ads in Hear Me Out by joining Slate Plus. Sign up now at </em><a href=\"http://slate.com/plus\"><em>slate.com/plus</em></a><em> for just $15 for your first three months.</em></p><p> </p>","author_name":"Slate Podcasts"}