{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/69545da8cb029db7575279fc/69545e20d0c0aeaf12d8f354?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"SmileDirectClub’s great pre-IPO (but bad IPO), Under Armour goes anti-athleisure, and General Electric is selling itself to survive","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/69545da8cb029db7575279fc/4fa8aa48569b5163026c03da5fcf6b1e.jpeg?height=200","description":"SmileDirectClub (uncreative ticker symbol, FYI) falls 28% on its IPO day, but we look at whether it was really a bad IPO when you look at the valuation. Under Armour is going anti-athleisure with its new strategy, but it’s actually copying Lululemon. And General Electric is selling $38B of itself to survive, which highlights its greatest disadvantage: Pensions.\nLearn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices","author_name":"Nick & Jack Studios"}