{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/69380c0d4a9751f83d7c325d/6a184c87029c20a5f6e873b0?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Can architecture be democratic?","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/69380c0d4a9751f83d7c325d/1779977285466-5db564e1-d9bb-4dcb-b1ef-f831967c57a4.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>What is the relationship between politics and the built environment? between the spaces inhabited by the public and the policies that govern them?&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>From parliaments to monuments… from open squares to closed off palaces… there clearly is a connection, but how that manifests itself remains deeply contested.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>Tanjil Rashid is joined by Jan Werner-Muller, a German philosopher and historian, whose latest book, <em>Street, Palace, Square: The Architecture of Democratic Spaces </em>investigates this relationship between place, people and politics.</p>","author_name":"The New Statesman"}