{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/68faf3ba8e22c64fb14dd038/695ca7f58102e76a3a66dcbe?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"#5 The LOUD Poison","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/68faf3ba8e22c64fb14dd038/1772157484998-da04decc-1d98-4012-b8e7-fac806bd145d.jpeg?height=200","description":"<h2><em>Polonium. Novichok. Now epibatidine. As Europe marks four years of war in Ukraine, explosive claims about Alexei Navalny’s death raise a darker question: Is conspicuous poison part of Russia’s playbook?</em></h2><h2><br></h2><p>Four years after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Europe marks an anniversary defined by trench warfare, drone strikes and geopolitical stalemate.</p><p>But while the world focuses on the battlefield, another front may have been operating in plain sight.</p><p>In this episode of <strong>Max Marten Chats</strong>, we examine explosive claims by the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands that Russian opposition leader <strong>Alexei Navalny</strong> was poisoned with <strong>epibatidine, </strong>a rare toxin derived from South American poison dart frogs, before his death in an Arctic penal colony in February 2024.</p><p><br></p><p>If confirmed, this would not be an isolated incident. It would sit alongside:</p><ul><li>The 2006 poisoning of <strong>Alexander Litvinenko</strong> with radioactive <strong>polonium-210</strong> in London</li><li>The 2018 <strong>Salisbury Novichok attack</strong> on Sergei Skripal</li><li>The 2020 attempted poisoning of Navalny with the Soviet-era nerve agent <strong>Novichok</strong></li></ul><p><br></p><p>We ask the uncomfortable question:</p><p>Is Russia fighting only a territorial war in Ukraine — or prosecuting a broader, layered campaign that includes demonstrative poisonings, chemical signalling, and global deterrence?</p><p><br></p><p>This episode explores:</p><ul><li>The science behind <strong>epibatidine toxicity</strong></li><li>The legal implications under the <strong>Chemical Weapons Convention</strong> and the <strong>Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention</strong></li><li>The “loud poison” theory — why conspicuous toxins may function as geopolitical messaging</li><li>The erosion of international chemical weapon taboos</li><li>What Navalny’s death means in the context of four years of the <strong>Russo-Ukrainian War</strong></li></ul><p><br></p><p>This is not conspiracy.</p><p>This is pattern recognition.</p><p><br></p><p>As the war in Ukraine enters its fifth year, the question is no longer whether the world knows.</p><p>The question is whether knowing is enough.</p><p><br></p><p>#AlexeiNavalny, #NavalnyPoisoning, #RussiaUkraineWar, #Epibatidine, #Novichok, #Litvinenko, #SalisburyAttack, #Geopolitics, #ChemicalWeapons, #MaxMartenChats</p><p><br></p>","author_name":"BearSlayer Media"}