{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/68dae8546d92c33f9cf3aaf4/698ba627337b2a3b2e262f3e?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Episode Forteen - Is it a \"scam\" or is it a \"fraud\"?","description":"<p>What's the difference between a scam and a fraud?</p><p>Do you have the same reaction when told someone has been scammed as you would if you'd been told they'd been the victim of fraud?</p><p> </p><p>That's the question we look at in this week's episode as we look at a paper entitled \"More than splitting hairs: Exploring trivialisation and harmful narrative distortion in the synonymous use of ‘scam’ and ‘fraud’\". </p><p>It is authored by Elisabeth Carter, Jack Mark Whittaker, and Tim Day, and published in the journal Crime Media Culture.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17416590251393960</p><p><br></p><p>To contact A Perspective on Crime follow the link below</p><p>https://tr.ee/Ymb5yiqRUW</p>","author_name":"Shane Tanner"}