{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/68c319db86eb67a6f6b2a910/69e3a3df0b4baf3bf29f071e?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"What's the point of TV debates?","description":"<p>In 2010, Britain had its first ever Prime Ministerial debates, with Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Nick Clegg going head-to-head in front of the TV cameras. The idea had first been mooted as early as 1964, when Harold Wilson challenged Alec Douglas-Home to an on-air joust. So why did it take so long for them to happen? What advantages and disadvantages did the debates bring in the 2010 election - and since? And do they actually serve a useful purpose in British politics? Lee and Richard discuss in this latest episode of 'Since Attlee &amp; Churchill.'</p><p><br></p><p>In this episode, the following books are mentioned:</p><p>'Scoop' by Evelyn Waugh. Available at: https://uk.bookshop.org/a/16406/9780141184029</p><p>'America's Unwritten Constitution: The Precedents and Principles We Live By' by Akhil Reed Amar. Available at: https://uk.bookshop.org/a/16406/9780465033096</p><p><br></p><p>Enjoy ad-free listening, bonus episodes and show your support for the podcast by joining the Since Attlee &amp; Churchill Patreon:<a href=\"https://www.patreon.com/c/SinceAttleeAndChurchill\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"> https://www.patreon.com/c/SinceAttleeAndChurchill</a></p><p><br></p><p>Buying books via the Since Attlee &amp; Churchill Bookshop is a great way to support the podcast. Click here to visit the shop: https://uk.bookshop.org/shop/saac</p>","author_name":"Lee David Evans & Richard Johnson"}