{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/68bcc11d1af371182a330d09/69810ab119ef991f735fccd7?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"S5. Episode 2. Odyssey","description":"<p>This episode of&nbsp;<strong>Regarding… Music From The Elder</strong>&nbsp;takes on&nbsp;<strong>Odyssey,</strong>&nbsp;the Paul Stanley–sung epic where KISS decides that the best way to build mythology is to state it very solemnly and hope the listener fills in the blanks.</p><p>Chaz Charles, Greg “Wolfie” Wolf, Scott D. Monroe, and Corey Morissette break down a song that&nbsp;<em>has lyrics</em>,&nbsp;<em>has a singer</em>, and&nbsp;<em>has enormous confidence</em>&nbsp;— yet still leaves everyone asking the same question:</p><p><strong>Who is Paul Stanley supposed to be right now?</strong></p><p>Is he the voice of the Elders?</p><p>A historian?</p><p>A prophet?</p><p>A tour guide pointing vaguely at a fantasy world just off-camera?</p><p>That confusion comes into sharp focus around one of the song’s most baffling images:&nbsp;<strong>the child in a sundress</strong>. The panel spends time trying to figure out who this child is supposed to be, why we’re meant to care, and how such a specific image can feel emotionally loaded while remaining completely untethered to any character, story, or stakes. Is it innocence? A symbol? A memory? Or just another gesture toward meaning without the work of defining it?</p><p>The episode digs deep into the song’s core tension:&nbsp;<strong>Odyssey wants to function as narration without committing to a narrator.</strong>&nbsp;Paul sings declarative, myth-heavy lines with total conviction, but the lyrics never establish perspective, stakes, or character — creating a song that sounds profound while remaining stubbornly abstract.</p><p>The panel unpacks:</p><ul><li>How Paul’s performance sells seriousness even when the lyrics wobble</li><li>Why repetition is doing most of the storytelling heavy lifting</li><li>How the song insists that a grand journey is underway without showing us any of it</li><li>And why this kind of myth-making teeters dangerously close to self-parody</li></ul><p>Comparisons are made to&nbsp;<strong>2112</strong>, classic fantasy tropes, and&nbsp;<strong>Monty Python’s mock-epic moments</strong>, where absolute sincerity collides with material that can’t quite support it. The group debates whether “Odyssey” is misunderstood ambition, overreach, or simply a band confusing&nbsp;<strong>importance</strong>&nbsp;with&nbsp;<strong>clarity</strong>.</p><p>The episode closes — after post-production reordering — with a&nbsp;<strong>table read from Scott D. Monroe’s original screenplay</strong>, now placed at the end of the show, finally giving “Odyssey” the narrative framework it always seemed to demand… and quietly highlighting how much the song itself leaves unsaid.</p><p>This isn’t about vocals.</p><p>It’s about&nbsp;<strong>authority without definition</strong>.</p><p><strong>The Regarding…Series — we listen so you don’t have to.</strong></p>","author_name":"Chaz Charles, Greg Wolfe, Scott Monroe, Corey Morrisette"}