{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/68a9bc65352b565deb015a62/68cd7eeef5e00f6ca4295904?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"4. Jerome's Trial part 2","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/68a9bc65352b565deb015a62/1758297644728-72889fe0-101d-4663-8e00-ddcbccb6ca76.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>Episode 4 of <em>Rape on Trial</em> sees us back in court for the conclusion of Jerome’s trial for the robbery of five sex workers and rape of one; another case involving what the conventional wisdom tells us is the wrong kind of rape and the wrong kind of victim and shouldn't result in convictions.</p><p><br></p><p>As in Tariq's case, this trial, and the jury’s verdict, raise difficult questions for mainstream accounts of rape in the criminal process, the impact of rape myths and gender stereotypes on victim credibility, courtroom advocacy and the conduct of cross-examination, and how the criminal justice system actually works in these cases.</p>","author_name":"Dr Candida Saunders "}