Episode 4 of Rape on Trial sees us back in court for the conclusion of Jerome’s trial for the robbery of five sex workers and rape of one; another case involving what the conventional wisdom tells us is the wrong kind of rape and the wrong kind of victim and shouldn't result in convictions.
As in Tariq's case, this trial, and the jury’s verdict, raise difficult questions for mainstream accounts of rape in the criminal process, the impact of rape myths and gender stereotypes on victim credibility, courtroom advocacy and the conduct of cross-examination, and how the criminal justice system actually works in these cases.
Topics and key elements covered in this episode: the remainder of the prosecution case; hearsay evidence; agreed statements; agreed evidence; evidence of first complaint; evidence of the defendant's bad character; the defence case; defendant's evidence-in-chief; cross-examination of the defendant charged with rape; adding charges to the indictment mid-trial; judge's directions; closing speeches; final directions; jury questions; verdict and thoughts on whether it reflects rape myths and stereotypes or evidence and proof.
A must listen for those studying criminal law, criminal evidence and procedure, advocacy and trial strategy, criminal justice, and criminology as well as those interested in forensic linguistics and forensic psychology.
As a detailed and comprehensive account of real court proceedings in a criminal trial in an adversarial, common law legal system, this is also an excellent resource for international students learning Legal English, the Language of Law, and comparative law.
Legal English Learning Practice
Legal English Comprehension Practice
Legal English Vocabulary
Applied Legal English
Legal English in the courtroom
","author_name":"Dr Candida Saunders "}