{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/68a9bc65352b565deb015a62/68bb2a7ba4a9a4d9459448ea?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"3. Jerome's Trial part 1","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/68a9bc65352b565deb015a62/1757095674550-7f746aac-2f18-41bc-b749-03ff3e72592b.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>We’re repeatedly told that juries only convict in “real rape” cases with “ideal victims.” Episode 3 of <strong>Criminal Justice in Action: Rape on Trial</strong> continues to challenges those assumptions.</p><p><br></p><p>We're back in Crown Court for the trial of Jerome, accused of robbing five women and raping one. The complainants are sex workers, and the conduct of the trial — and its outcome — raise important questions about the prominence and impact of rape myths and gender stereotypes in rape trials, and how courtroom practice and jury decision-making are portrayed in the mainstream, public narrative about rape in the criminal process.</p><p><br></p>","author_name":"Dr Candida Saunders "}