{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/688bd9d76bbbf6afc7811bec/699b5ca1166f17685898ed45?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Did AI Break the Final Exam? The Experiment That Won Best Track | S2 E4","description":"<p>What if the final exam is not broken because of AI, but because we never redesigned it for a world where AI exists?</p><p>In this episode of Mr. Fred’s Tech Talks, I share the story behind a classroom experiment I presented at an international conference. The session earned Best Track recognition, which was encouraging. More important, it confirmed something I almost talked myself out of trying.</p><p><br></p><p>Instead of banning AI, I redesigned my final exam to include it.</p><p><br></p><p>You will hear:</p><p>• Why traditional finals may not measure what matters anymore</p><p> • How I structured a two part exam with a foundational section and an open AI section</p><p> • What surprised me most about student behavior</p><p> • Why AI does not replace fundamentals, it reveals them</p><p> • How educators and parents can experiment without freezing</p><p><br></p><p>This episode is not about awards. It is about action. If you have an idea you have been overthinking, this may be your nudge to test it.</p><p>AI is not going away. </p><p><br></p><p>The question is whether we will design wisely around it.</p>","author_name":"Fred Aebli"}