{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/6858d0a2dc316de3df2aac5a/6abf480499c0dcb8c5933553?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"ONLY FRAN: The USA v The ICC explained","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/6858d0a2dc316de3df2aac5a/1790921486287-537d283c-c7ab-4471-885d-b28b416178b8.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>This week Jan Fran takes a look at the battle between the Trump administration and the International Criminal Court, although can you really call it a battle when it’s only one side doing the battling? </p><p><br></p><p>In addition to sanctioning individual members of the court, Donald Trump and his trusted Secretary of State, Marco Rubio are now considering sanctions against the <em>entire organisation. </em></p><p><br></p><p>If that happens it would be an unprecedented <em>f**k you</em> to international law by a man determined never to be bound by it.</p>","author_name":"Ette Media"}