{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/6858d0a2dc316de3df2aac5a/6a3a5444c32e0e5b15ab8be9?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Health regulator’s controversial IHRA definition, Starmer’s resignation exploited + Rinehart’s wild Israel proposal ","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/6858d0a2dc316de3df2aac5a/1782207783333-92a71b85-973f-412c-a45d-aafca1ecfb23.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>In this episode Jan and Antoinette look at the way both Donald Trump and Pauline Hanson used Keir Starmer’s resignation to further their own anti-immigrant, anti-climate change agenda and how the media helped out.&nbsp;</p><p>Plus, Gina Rinehart’s ‘Bush Summit’ speech gets the coverage she asked for but not the coverage it deserved.&nbsp;</p><p>And we unpack the decision by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency - APHRA - to adopt the IHRA definition of anti semitism. We look at how this might quash criticism of Israel, why medical practitioners are ropable and why the media has been mute.&nbsp;</p><p>There’s also a shout out to you -&nbsp;our Etterati - for your feedback after last week’s episode on how we can better contribute to online discourse.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Support Ette Media by becoming a subscriber</strong><a href=\"https://www.ettemedia.com/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><strong> here.</strong></a></p><p><strong>Grab a discounted Tshirt</strong><a href=\"https://www.ettemedia.com/shop/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><strong> here.</strong></a></p><p><strong>Use the code WIN10 for 27% of RRP on ‘Women Who Win’ at </strong><a href=\"https://www.booktopia.com.au/women-who-win-antoinette-lattouf/book/9781761355370.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Booktopia.</strong></a></p>","author_name":"Ette Media"}