{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/6851792d002f9da49a7fbef5/69de57282cab0d3ec895d722?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Southport inquiry: they knew he was evil, why wasn’t he stopped?","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/6851792d002f9da49a7fbef5/1776178952462-e34dfe65-25cd-4649-9f57-0656e1556216.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>This week: the Southport inquiry and a deeper question about why Britain’s institutions keep failing to act. After a damning report into the killings revealed that Axel Rudakubana was ‘known to authorities’, Michael and Madeline ask how so many warning signs were missed. Did a fear of getting things wrong – or being accused of racism – stop professionals from intervening?&nbsp;</p><p>Also on the podcast: another retreat from Keir Starmer. The government has dropped its Chagos bill – but is this a pragmatic recognition of geopolitical reality, or another sign of strategic confusion at the top of government?</p><p>And finally: Labour’s growing dilemma over sex and gender. One year on from the Supreme Court’s ruling on biological sex, why is the government still dragging its feet on guidance?&nbsp;</p><p>Produced by Oscar Edmondson.</p>","author_name":"The Spectator"}