{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/68359028e1abc4be6b032cd1/6ad0e38137f0bd18cc67fcad?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Does Britain still have free speech? | with Jonathan Sumption & Kellie-Jay Keen ","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/68359028e1abc4be6b032cd1/1792074209011-9b88af60-7652-4c34-9100-e720c7e45ed5.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>This week, The Spectator hosted a debate on the motion: This house believes Britain no longer has free speech.</p><p><br></p><p>Chaired by The Spectator’s Assistant Editor Isabel Hardman, the debate saw former Sun editor Kelvin MacKenzie and women’s rights campaigner Kellie-Jay Keen propose the motion, with former Supreme Court Justice Jonathan Sumption and politician and commentator Ed Vaizey arguing against it.</p><p><br></p><p>In this episode, we hear Jonathan Sumption and Kellie-Jay Keen set out their cases before the panel goes head-to-head on cancel culture, the role of the police, overzealous lawyers and the responsibility of the press. </p><p><br></p><p>To find out more about upcoming Spectator events, visit events.spectator.co.uk.</p><p><br></p><p>Produced by Abigail Brierley.</p>","author_name":"The Spectator"}