{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/68359028e1abc4be6b032cd1/6932a4174a0500b7575233f6?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"‘Superadvisers’ and the Starmer paradox: who really runs No. 10?","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/68359028e1abc4be6b032cd1/1764925656991-45611ea3-ef1a-4eaa-9ce4-da021b268004.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>This weekend’s <em>Coffee House Shots</em> digs into the growing debate over whether Keir Starmer should tack left on the economy as voters peel away to the Greens and Lib Dems – and why some in Labour think its migration stance is now more popular with their own voters than ever. Are Labour tacking left? </p><p>But beyond policy, a deeper question looms: is Westminster’s obsession with ‘super-advisers’ drowning out the government’s message? Tom Baldwin argues that leaks, briefing wars and the hunt for the next ‘power-behind-the-throne’ are undermining Labour’s ability to tell a coherent story, while Tim Shipman asks why Starmer still struggles to communicate the values that drive him.</p><p>James Heale speaks to Tim Shipman and Tom Baldwin, Keir Starmer's biographer.</p><p>Produced by Oscar Edmondson.</p>","author_name":"The Spectator"}