{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/68359028e1abc4be6b032cd1/692040bcf1f764f8235a16df?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Covid report: ‘a £200 million I told you so’","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/68359028e1abc4be6b032cd1/1763720931186-1676b988-80b1-4a76-bece-9a696e59908e.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>Yesterday we had the publication of the second module of the Covid Inquiry on the decision-making at the heart of government. It confirmed a toxic and disorganised culture at the heart of No. 10 and the headline is that the government acted ‘too little, too late’, costing as many as 23,000 lives in England.</p><p>That figure is already disputed, not least by our economics editor Michael Simmons who argues on the podcast that the inquiry is a ‘disgrace’ and demonstrates a lack of domain knowledge about the limitations of modelling. Where else does the inquiry fall short? What will be the political ramifications in Westminster?</p><p>James Heale speaks to Michael Simmons and Isabel Hardman.</p><p>Produced by Oscar Edmondson.</p>","author_name":"The Spectator"}