{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/68359028e1abc4be6b032cd1/6893692ec952cf5978a98047?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"What Douglas Murray’s court win means for press freedom","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/68359028e1abc4be6b032cd1/1754491123297-11b7abd6-e3bc-4f6d-ae27-9fd3a7e568a2.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p><em>The Spectator</em>&nbsp;and Douglas Murray have comprehensively won a defamation case brought by Mohammed Hegab.</p><p><br></p><p>Hegab, a YouTuber who posts under the name Mohammed Hijab, claimed that an article about the Leicester riots, written by Douglas Murray and published by&nbsp;<em>The Spectator</em>in September 2022, caused serious harm to his reputation and led to a loss of earnings. However, the judge found that the article did not cause serious harm to Hijab<strong>,</strong> that what was published was substantially true,&nbsp;and that Hijab had ‘lied on significant issues’ in court and had given evidence that ‘overall, is worthless’. What does this case mean for the future of press freedom?</p><p><br></p><p>On today’s podcast, Michael Simmons discusses the case with Alex Wilson,<em>&nbsp;The Spectator’</em>s lawyer, and Max Jeffery, who attended court on behalf of the magazine.</p><p><br></p><p>Produced by Oscar Edmondson and Megan McElroy.</p>","author_name":"The Spectator"}