{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/68358fb5e1abc4be6b0308eb/69b443cc1b5a7dfbdf6db75b?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Coffee House Shots: is the government right to restrict jury trials?","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/68358fb5e1abc4be6b0308eb/1773421493801-28a609cb-49d7-4f9e-9c38-aba9f913daef.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>The government's plan to restrict jury trials passed its first parliamentary hurdle this week. It is one measure, amongst many, in a Bill designed to reduce the huge backlog currently facing the Courts. Labour MP Karl Turner and Danny Shaw, a former adviser, join Isabel Hardman to discuss why they have each come to their own, different conclusion about the merits of the Bill. </p><p><br></p><p>For Danny, it is a pragmatic yet principled measure that will help mitigate an extreme situation. Karl, for his part, is – as you will hear – ferocious in his opposition, and argues that the evidence simply doesn't back it up. Amongst the debate though, there are moments of agreement – from the state of the justice system, to the government's handling of such a controversial measure.</p><p><br></p><p>Produced by Patrick Gibbons.</p>","author_name":"The Spectator"}