{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/68205f1d365a6906d3f5ef3a/69ee7a3e738b0d0aa5683c75?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Are generational labels still meaningful?","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/68205f1d365a6906d3f5ef3a/1777232913919-12d108b1-6959-4e87-b00c-344aed4b48f7.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>We’re chatting about the art and maybe the absurdity of grouping people by age. Do labels like ‘Boomer,’ ‘Millennial,’ or ‘Gen Z’ actually help us connect, or are they just a way to avoid the hard work of seeing each other as individuals? Can we find real insight in or within these categories, or are we just guessing our way out of genuine human connection?</p><p><br></p><p>So whatever label we've been assigned, we’re asking: Are generational labels still meaningful? </p><p><br></p><p>Can we agree on this?</p>","author_name":"The Agreeable Amigos"}