When a newspaper article about the Rabbi and the Imam's interfaith work and friendship went public, most of the response was positive.
But buried in the Facebook comments was something darker: a stranger claiming that the Imam could not wait to take the Rabbi somewhere to be butchered, with the remark followed by a smiley face.
Rabbi Dovid shared the comment with his wife. She stopped what she was doing, looked up at him, and said:
\"So you're now going to go and sit in a studio with this guy? With a man whose faith, honestly and theologically, believes you have a responsibility to kill him?\"
That question sits at the heart of this episode.
Does one religion really mandate the death of the other?
If so, what does it mean for their friendship?
Rather than brushing the comment aside, the Rabbi and the Imam use it as a chance to examine one of the most misunderstood and weaponised narrations.
What We Get Into:
The Comment Itself
The exact words, the immediate emotional reaction, and why Dovid says: \"It only takes one. And the person is still dead. It does not matter whether or not he was misrepresenting his faith.\"
The Hadith That Extremists Love to Quote
Nasser traces the origin of the quote, its context as an end‑of‑times prophecy, and delivers a direct verdict on its relevance today.
Al‑Wala Wal‑Bara, Allegiance & Disassociation
Nasser clarifies the distinction between friendship and total allegiance, and why the two are not the same thing.
Judaism's Red Lines
Dovid explains which theological positions would constitute a genuine barrier in Jewish law.
Politics Poisoning Religion
They examine how the conflict in the Middle East does not just colour geopolitics; it colours how people read their own scripture, and how dangerous that is.
This podcast was filmed in a studio in south Manchester and is now available to watch here on our new Youtube channel