{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/67ef8d23dd74d6439c160aa5/682b9882ee813e8be219e672?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Looker","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/67ef8d23dd74d6439c160aa5/1747687357824-076aed36-6bfa-4644-b903-8faaa171cc98.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>In <em>Looker</em>,<em> </em>Michael Crichton warned us of a future in which computer-generated thirst-traps manipulate unwitting consumers through the media, all at the behest of powerful tech moguls. In 1981, this all seemed a bit ridiculous –&nbsp;especially as performed by a stodgy Albert Finney chasing around with an Atari lightgun trying to rescue Playboy models. Not surprisingly, it only hacked $3.3 million out of the box office against an estimated $12 million budget. But it is a cruelly rejected gem that was way ahead of its time?&nbsp;Find out!</p>","author_name":"Conrad Chambers and Daniel Goh"}