{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/678198d8ec40818e0b7a9fbb/6a2600b36263fbced6c039c9?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Taking Stock: The State of CDR - Fireside Chat with Oliver Geden","description":"<p>Recorded live at the Negative Emissions Platform (NEP) event in June 2026, this fireside chat brings Sebastian Manhart together with Oliver Geden for a rapid-fire sweep through the state of CDR policy.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>Oliver Geden is Head of the Research Cluster on Climate and Energy Policy at SWP (the German Institute for International and Security Affairs), Vice Chair of IPCC Working Group Three, and a member of the executive team of the State of CDR Report. He co-authored Chapter Five on policy in the report's third edition, published the week this conversation was recorded.</p><p><br></p><p>Together they dig into the questions that matter, the numbers that mislead, and the politics underneath both. In 30 minutes they cover a lot of ground: the policy sequencing debate, what the 16% CDR share of global mitigation effort actually means, and which countries are pulling ahead.</p><p><br></p><p>Oliver walks through why over 100 countries now have net zero targets, yet novel CDR features in only two NDCs through to 2035, Australia and the UK, and in around one-third of long-term strategies for 2050. He draws on his IPCC experience to explain the shift in how CDR has been framed in intergovernmental negotiations: from \"scenarios suggest you'll need it\" to \"you cannot reach net zero without it.\" That shift forecloses the option of treating CDR as an optional add-on, but it hasn't yet translated into concrete national planning at scale.</p><p><br></p><p>The conversation gets into the weeds on EU policy design: the complexity of introducing national durable removal targets within the pillar system, the tension in the international credits debate between what the text says and what policymakers are actually trying to achieve, and a concept Oliver introduces that is worth holding onto: \"politically hard to abate.\" The episode closes on a question that would have felt out of place a year ago: what the war in Iran does to climate and CDR policy ambition, and Oliver's answer is, characteristically, clear-eyed.</p><p><br></p><p>Show notes:</p><ul><li>Sebastian Manhart:<a href=\"https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastianmanhart/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"> LinkedIn</a> and<a href=\"https://www.sebastianmanhart.com/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"> Website</a></li><li>Oliver Geden: <a href=\"https://www.linkedin.com/in/oliver-geden/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">LinkedIn</a></li><li><a href=\"https://www.stateofcdr.org/report/3rd-edition\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">State of CDR Report, 3rd Edition</a>:</li></ul>","author_name":"Eve Tamme and Sebastian Manhart"}