{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/678198d8ec40818e0b7a9fbb/67dc7a50d1a5740aeb023849?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"SBTi: Step forward or missed opportunity for CDR? - with Robert Höglund","description":"<p>8,000 companies have emission reduction targets validated by the Science Based Targets initiative. Only around 50 of them have so far purchased durable carbon removal.</p><p><br></p><p>Imagine if all of them purchased CDR? The impact could be &gt;50Mt of demand. Per year. Starting from 2030.</p><p><br></p><p>On March 18th, the SBTi released the draft net-zero standard 2.0 which marks a potential inflection point. Will it:</p><ul><li>Drive companies to begin CDR purchases immediately?</li><li>Keep CDR voluntary until the 2040s?</li><li>⁠Inadvertently push companies away from SBTi due to concerns about mandatory CDR costs?</li></ul><p><br></p><p>To make sense of this wide spectrum of possibilities, the CDR Policy Scoop is delighted to have Robert Höglund back on the show. He has been a member of the external SBTi Technical Advisory Group and understands the process and its implications for CDR like no other.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Links:</strong></p><ul><li>Eve Tamme: <a href=\"https://www.linkedin.com/in/evetamme/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">LinkedIn</a> and <a href=\"https://evetamme.com/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Website</a></li><li>Sebastian Manhart: <a href=\"https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastianmanhart/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">LinkedIn</a> and <a href=\"https://www.sebastianmanhart.com/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Website</a></li><li>Robert Höglund: <a href=\"https://www.linkedin.com/in/roberthoglund/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">LinkedIn</a>, <a href=\"https://www.marginalcarbon.com/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Website</a>, and <a href=\"https://marginalcarbon.substack.com/p/what-needs-to-change-in-the-sbti\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">SBTi draft CNZS Analysis</a></li><li><a href=\"https://sciencebasedtargets.org/news/sbti-launches-draft-corporate-net-zero-standard-v2-for-consultation\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">SBTi’s draft Corporate Net Zero Standard Consultation</a></li><li><a href=\"https://www.carbon-direct.com/insights/sbti-emphasizes-near-term-carbon-removal-in-revised-corporate-standard-draft\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Carbon Direct Analysis on draft SBTi CNZS</a></li><li><a href=\"https://isometric.com/writing-articles/sbtis-net-zero-standard-2-0-what-it-means-for-carbon-dioxide-removal\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Lukas May analysis on potential CDR demand of draft SBTi’s CNZS</a></li></ul><p><br></p>","author_name":"Eve Tamme and Sebastian Manhart"}