{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/6729ff058e194291075f11a8/696e560e4788cf9ec6f12050?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"S2 Ep1: Forfeiture of leases","description":"<p>Christopher Heather KC and Elizabeth Fisher explore one of the oldest and most challenging areas of property law: forfeiture of leases. In this episode, they consider four recent cases that highlight the practical difficulties, key principles, and evolving aspects of forfeiture.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Citations:&nbsp;</strong></p><p><strong>Cases</strong></p><p>Sik v Malik [2025] EWHC 383 (Ch)&nbsp;</p><p>The Tropical Zoo Ltd v The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Hounslow [2024] EWHC 1240 (Ch).</p><p>Tanfield v Meadowbrook Montessori Ltd [2024] EWHC 1759 (Ch)</p><p>Freifeld v West Kensington Court Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 806</p><p>Magnic Ltd v Ul-Hassan and anor [2015] EWCA Civ 224</p><p>Bland v Ingrams Estates Ltd (No 2) [2001] EWCA Civ 1088</p><p>First penthouse Ltd v Channel Hotels and Proper Ties (UK) Ltd [2003] EWHC 2713 (Ch)</p><p>McDrury v Luporini [2000] 1 NZLR 652—&gt; would we add?&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Legislation&nbsp;</strong></p><p>Law of Property Act 1925, s 146&nbsp;</p><p>Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, s 25</p><p><br></p><p>Producer: Peter Shevlin</p><p>A Pod60 production for Tanfield</p><p><a href=\"https://pod60.com/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://pod60.com/</a></p>","author_name":"Tanfield"}