{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/6712aef6e21e2bb3149f1fd5/69e05a2ae733e471898ac9ff?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Tokenmaxxing","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/6712aef6e21e2bb3149f1fd5/1776310820639-a6cbd931-b2ac-4a84-a947-6606c77d4107.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>Dan, Toby, and Chmiel break down the Silicon Valley flex nobody's asking enough questions about: burning tokens as a workplace KPI. Is maxing your token usage a signal of genuine AI-first thinking — or just a new way to dress up the same old productivity theater?</p><p><br></p><p>Details of the show:</p><ul><li>Jensen Huang's \"$500K in tokens or you're not doing it right\" interview and why it's both a marketing stunt and a real cultural shift</li><li>Why Meta's internal token leaderboard (they called it Clawdynamics) collapsed when employees just built bots to game it</li><li>The NBER study: 90% of firms reporting zero productivity from AI initiatives — and what it says about the gap between token burning and actual outcomes</li><li>\"Refounding\" vs. transformation — a new word for the same old fuzzy concept, or something actually different?</li><li>Why the billion-dollar one-person company is probably wrong — and the five-person version might be right</li></ul><p><br></p>","author_name":"ON_Discourse"}