{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/66fa99d113b87f412725299a/6841d0a17bb6c018ff23d6c0?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Politicians probably shouldn’t let AI do all the talking","description":"<p>As one of our reporters read through an open letter on Gaza penned by Ciarán Mullooly, one detail stood out: a bizarre reference to Swedish House Mafia. A spokesperson for the journalist-turned-MEP quickly confirmed that artificial intelligence was used to generate portions of the letter. But surely he's not alone in using ChatGPT et al during his official duties? This is a case where it went badly wrong, but to what standards should we hold politicians when it comes to the use of AI?</p><p><br></p><p>Christine Bohan, Jane Matthews, and journalist-turned-AI-sniffer-dog Muiris Ó Cearbhaill have an entirely human conversation about the rise of AI and what it means for political discourse.</p><p><br></p><p>Also: the clock is ticking, but will any politician give Jane an actual answer on who might be running for president?</p>","author_name":"The Journal"}