{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/66e88bfb7c942966760e9d78/69a1eef647697ac8037a1aff?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Science vs. SORA: Examining NY's Risk Assessment Instrument","description":"<p>In this episode of <em>Justice Speaks</em>, Executive Director Cheryl Roberts examines the controversial reality of New York’s Risk Assessment Instrument (RAI). Joined by experts Dr. Katsavdakis, Alan Rosenthal, and Judge Conviser, the conversation explores how a system based on unvalidated research from 1996 can create a misleading perception of public safety. Together, the guests analyze the legal and psychological implications of these arbitrary scores—including their impact on housing and lifetime registration—while discussing the critical need for a system aligned with modern scientific data and clinical expertise.</p>","author_name":"The Greenburger Center for Justice"}