{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/6686611e03dd2c690e0a0e89/6a50af1eefeba87a439c9eac?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Impeachment Trial 101 with UP Law Professor Paolo Tamase ","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/6686611e03dd2c690e0a0e89/1783672924084-faeaf8cd-690c-4f2e-a516-2b48193b2076.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>\"The truth-telling makes the impeachment process worth it.”&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>UP Law School Associate Dean Paolo Tamase explains to Howie Severino the various ways an impeachment trial is different from a regular courtroom trial.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>He warns against \"over-judicialization,\" or getting bogged down in legal procedures, when an impeachment trial is more of a political process meant to ferret out the truth in service of accountability.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Their conversation revisits previous impeachment cases, including the infamous \"second envelope\" vote that triggered EDSA 2 during the Joseph Estrada trial and the historic conviction of Chief Justice Renato Corona.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Now that a Vice President is on trial, Atty. Tamase raises intriguing questions, such as in the event of her resignation in the middle of the proceedings, should the trial continue?</p>","author_name":"GMA News"}