{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/663109c2cff31b0012ae91dc/6720ddf2fab47fdf26063e8a?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"082: 2D Comparison","description":"<p>Jamie asked: \"anyone got good exercises for evolving your brand (and in particular visual identity) in-house? Did I remember&nbsp;you (Tom &amp; Corissa)&nbsp;mentioning an exercise like clustering examples into \"we want to be more like this\" vs \"we want to be less like that\"?\"</p><p><br></p><p>So&nbsp;we wanted to give the exercise we designed its own special episode.</p><p><br></p><p>Time and again, we saw projects get in a pickle when people tried to choose adjectives to define things like brand qualities, tone of voice, product principles or corporate values.</p><p><br></p><p>This kind of ambiguous, subjective stuff is impossible to define perfectly with words, especially upfront.</p><p><br></p><p>You could choose to work with a grizzled expert who can read between the lines of what you're saying to intuit what you <em>really</em> want.</p><p><br></p><p>But if you're on a shoestring and want to figure out this kind of thing with your team, then the exercise we share in this episode is for you.</p><p><br></p><p>Here's simplified instructions on a card: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/2rjpbrj1vqklcfc8glgw8/Sense-2D-Comparison-Back.png?rlkey=71v3muppoho2pnac2v9b9luim&amp;dl=0</p>","author_name":"Tom Kerwin and Corissa Nunn"}