{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/6619391c7155510017d1f9cc/69e62167abe143da5b23def6?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Baloney Detection Episode 41 - Should We Platform Both Sides If One is Extreme?","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/6619391c7155510017d1f9cc/1776689397246-11451dd1-8c79-4c39-b4ea-02b2f596532a.jpeg?height=200","description":"<h1>Episode Description</h1><p>This is a topic that I have been thinking about for&nbsp;a very&nbsp;long time. Social media and YouTube have&nbsp;a litany of&nbsp;channels that create “debates” that allow for extremely controversial opinions and beliefs to be shared. This is&nbsp;very common&nbsp;on YouTube channels like&nbsp;Jubilee&nbsp;which generates a lot of views with shows like “Surrounded” and “Middle Ground”.&nbsp;But does this promotion of extremely controversial ideas really make us more understanding? Thinking back on how well-known scientists like Peter Hotez and Anthony Fauci and how they have been&nbsp;pushed&nbsp;aside for other less experienced voices who promote misinformation and conspiracy makes me question&nbsp;whether or not&nbsp;we should&nbsp;allow the fringe to share their views. I speak about these things, along with a&nbsp;Pseudoshort&nbsp;about research ideas in this episode.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p><a href=\"https://drive.google.com/file/d/1i25coQzngcud7w_CJlkAh5kG1886cwWn/view?usp=sharing\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">View the episode transcript.</a></p><p> </p>","author_name":"James Kabrhel "}