{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/65afdf9fd45d470017f01af2/697b1f9134e93a474fc2e1e7?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Urgent and Existential Threat – has the ICJ Advisory Opinion changed the legal landscape?","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/65afdf9fd45d470017f01af2/1769676670290-da5b048e-2688-4c87-8cfa-66e35ea96cc7.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>Six months on from the landmark ruling by International Court of Justice which declared climate change “an urgent and existential threat” has anything changed for lawyers, law makers and businesses?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Has this opinion influenced corporate legal practice or shaped decision-making for firms or their clients? &nbsp;What are the due diligence obligations businesses need to know about, and if the 1.5°C target is increasingly seen as unachievable, how relevant does it remain as a legal and policy benchmark?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>In this episode Amanda Carpenter does a dive on the impact of the ruling with guests from both sides of the profession:&nbsp;Estelle Dehon KC, Cornerstone Barristers and Shane Gleghorn, UK Managing Partner at Taylor Wessing.</p>","author_name":"The Legal Sustainability Alliance"}