{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/65aa5c04a3555100168f5eec/6a56bafdf821a82109544fb0?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Living Wills and Powers of Attorney: Who determines when life support stops?","description":"<p>Accidents happen all the time, but how many of us have taken measures to ensure the life support machine is kept on (or turned off) according to our compos mentis desires? This week we are joined by Celia Kitzinger, founding co-director of the Open Justice Court of Protection Project and an honorary professor in the School of Law and Politics at the University of Cardiff, to discuss the merits and demerits of the Advance Decision to Refuse Treatment (ADRT), or living will, the legally binding document used to refuse specific medical treatments in the future if one loses the capacity to make or communicate decisions. Our conversation, of course, is kicked off by a scene from one of our favourite American medical dramas, The Pitt. </p><p><br></p><p>Law and Disorder is a Podot podcast.</p><p>Hosted by: Charlie Falconer, Helena Kennedy, Nicholas Mostyn.</p><p>Executive Producer and editor: Nick Hilton.</p><p>Associate Producers: Lulu Goad</p>","author_name":"Podot"}