{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/65aa5c04a3555100168f5eec/680bacc292c5c49bd1ff46c5?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers","description":"<p>This week, the Supreme Court passed its judgment on the case of For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers. The case challenged the assumed definitions of 'man' and 'woman' in the Equality Act 2010 and has provoked considerable commentary. The Supreme Court's verdict – delivered by Lord Hodge – appears to have vindicated the the campaigning of For Women Scotland, and other 'gender critical' organisations, beliefs about the primacy of biological sex. But could the verdict have unintended consequences? And where does this leave the beleaguered trans community? <strong>Nicholas Mostyn</strong>, <strong>Helena Kennedy</strong> and <strong>Charlie Falconer</strong> discuss.</p><p><br></p><p>If you have questions, criticisms, praise or other feedback, please do send your thoughts to us via <strong>lawanddisorderfeedback@gmail.com</strong>!</p><p><br></p><p>Law and Disorder is a <a href=\"http://podotpods.com/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Podot</a> podcast.</p><p>Hosted by: Charlie Falconer, Helena Kennedy, Nicholas Mostyn.</p><p>Executive Producer and Editor: Nick Hilton.</p><p>Associate Producer: Ewan Cameron.</p><p>Music by Richard Strauss, arranged and performed by Anthony Willis &amp; Brett Bailey.</p>","author_name":"Podot"}