{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/659f464c3f69070017409684/6a8339086e5b5bfda68ac884?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"#227 - LMIA Exemption Code C-20, “Papers Please” and IRGC Conscripts","description":"<p>We discuss three recent developments:</p><p><br></p><p>IRCC’s abrupt addition and removal of new requirements for C20 reciprocal-employment work permits;</p><p>CBSA officers checking the immigration status of participants at a Calgary protest, with 12 people identified as potentially inadmissible; and</p><p>The hundreds of procedural fairness letters being sent to former IRGC conscripts who may now face inadmissibility allegations based on compulsory military service.</p><p><br></p><p>We examine whether applicants and their lawyers can realistically keep pace with constantly shifting policies, what authority CBSA has to demand proof of status at a protest, whether people awaiting restoration can be removed, and why Parliament—not individual officers, applicants or courts—may need to resolve the consequences of mandatory IRGC service.</p><p><br></p><p>The episode concludes with audience questions about lengthy security screening, mandamus applications and whether Canada’s immigration-security measures reflect a coherent national security strategy.</p>","author_name":"Steven Meurrens and Deanna Okun-Nachoff"}