{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/659f464c3f69070017409684/65f0caf5edbd6100168d5908?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"[Repost] #35 - The Implications of the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in Vavilov","description":"<p>This episode is a repost of episode 35, which has been our most listened to podcast episode to date. It was recorded on 27 January 2020.</p><p><br></p><p><a href=\"https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/18078/index.do\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov</em>, 2019 SCC 65</a> was a landmark 2019 Supreme Court of Canada decision in which the Supreme Court of Canada outlined a new framework for the standard of review in Canadian administrative law.</p><p><br></p><p>The episode begins with a discussion between Steven and Robert Denay about how the standard of review works. Deanna and Steven then discuss how <em>Vavilov </em>could impact immigration law and practice.</p>","author_name":"Steven Meurrens and Deanna Okun-Nachoff"}