{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/655776911a7d7e0012cbc914/6911dc1ac1ed8717c591770e?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"China's Institutional Genes - Chenggang Xu | 2025 Episode 26","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/655776911a7d7e0012cbc914/1762777422924-e455a1f7-696b-42d3-a247-40b0d8b4db10.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>This episode of&nbsp;<em>The IR thinker</em>&nbsp;features Professor Chenggang Xu on the conceptual and empirical foundations of his book&nbsp;<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894708\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Institutional Genes: Origins of China’s Institutions and Totalitarianism</em></a>. The conversation unpacks what he means by “institutions” and “institutional genes”, how this framework helps to open the black box of political change, and why certain systems prove remarkably resilient over time. We explore the notion of “stemness”, the contrasts between imperial China and European monarchies, and how specific “genes” in the Russian system shaped Bolshevism. Professor Xu then traces Mao’s fusion of Marxism with the legacy of Qin Shi Huang, the institutional differences between Soviet and Chinese communism, and whether contemporary China should be understood as totalitarian or authoritarian. The discussion closes by examining tyrannical incentive structures, the risks of Soviet-style stagnation, and how the institutional genes framework can be extended beyond domestic politics to foreign policy and other domains of global governance.</p><p><br></p><h2>Chenggang Xu</h2><p><a href=\"https://sccei.fsi.stanford.edu/people/chenggang-xu\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Professor Chenggang Xu</a>&nbsp;is a Senior Research Scholar at the Stanford Center on China’s Economy and Institutions (SCCEI) and a Visiting Fellow at the Hoover Institution. A leading scholar of institutional economics, political economy and the Chinese political–economic system, he is widely known for developing the concept of regionally decentralised authoritarianism and, more recently, for his work on institutional genes and the historical roots of Chinese totalitarianism. His research is extensively cited in both academic and policy circles, and he has been awarded the China Economics Prize and the Sun Yefang Economics Prize in recognition of his contribution to the study of institutions, development and authoritarian governance.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Publications:</strong></p><p><a href=\"https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.49.4.1076\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><em>The fundamental institutions of China’s reforms and development</em></a></p><p><a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00135\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Incentives, information, and organizational form</em></a></p><p><a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105878\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Industrial clustering, income and inequality in rural China</em></a></p><p><a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbz038\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Clustering, growth and inequality in China</em></a></p><p><br></p><p><strong>Content</strong></p><p>00:00 - Introduction</p><p>01:45 - Why this book? The story behind ‘Institutional Genes’</p><p>06:34 - Defining ‘institution’ in the institutional genes framework</p><p>10:45 - Opening the black box: How institutional genes explain political change</p><p>16:29 - The concept of ‘stemness’ explained</p><p>20:01 - Imperial China vs European monarchies: Why China was more autocratic</p><p>28:28 - The three Russian genes that created Bolshevism</p><p>33:43 - Mao’s fusion: Marx plus Qin Shi Huang</p><p>38:58 - Soviet vs Chinese communism: Key institutional differences</p><p>42:23 - Totalitarian or authoritarian? Defining modern China</p><p>48:35 - Tyrannical incentive-compatibility: How totalitarian systems motivate</p><p>53:01 - Will China face Soviet-style economic stagnation?</p><p>58:52 - Applying institutional genes to foreign policy</p><p>01:03:16 - Beyond domestic politics: Where else can we apply this framework?</p>","author_name":"Martin Zubko"}