{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/65337aeb32aab9001268a81f/65e2e44cdfdd5a0017093d6c?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"FRAIL-AF","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/65337aeb32aab9001268a81f/1709368105612-25c987ebbad2257bf1d2a342bb1efad7.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>In this episode, Pip and Rich discuss the <strong>FRAIL-AF study</strong>: Joosten et al. Safety of Switching From a Vitamin K Antagonist to a Non–Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant in Frail Older Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the FRAIL-AF Randomized Controlled Trial. Circulation. 2024;149:279–289.</p><p><br></p><p>This trial randomised the switching of elderly frail patients who were established on a vitamin K antagonist to either remain on this treatment or switch to a direct oral anticoagulant. They found increased rates of bleeding in the switch arm. However, there is a lot of detail that is not in the abstract! Pip and Rich take a deep dive into the manuscript, discuss their thoughts with Chief Investigator, Geert Jan Geersing on the trial, and put the findings into context with consultant haematologist David Sutton.</p><p><br></p><p>To read more about this trial check out Rich's blog on it: https://classicalcompass.substack.com/p/frail-af</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Links</strong></p><p><br></p><p>FRAIL-AF: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epdf/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066485</p>","author_name":"Richard Buka"}