{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/650ac5ba0434d000118468a9/6a6a42a833878d3ae1a51acd?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"So you didn’t get a Burnham interview? Break out the tiny violins","description":"<p>In this week’s <em>Media Confidential</em>, Alan and Lionel talk about media publisher <em>Reach</em>’s change in direction. After years of striving for…well…reach, the publisher now says they’ll focus on long form reported stories.</p><p><br></p><p>After a federal judge savaged the US Department of Justice for issuing subpoenas against <em>New York Times</em> journalists, Alan and Lionel also discuss what they call a “fantastically stupid move by Trump”. They’ll also talk about the president’s swipes at the media at during White House Correspondent’s dinner. Does the iconic event have a future?</p><p><br></p><p>As Andy Burnham and John Healey were asked in a TikTok video: crisps, pork scratchings or scampi fries? The hosts discuss whether the government’s shrewd new media strategy is working.</p><p><br></p><p>Plus, they ask why Whitehall correspondents are complaining they haven’t had the chance to interview the new prime minister—is it clever strategy from Burnham, or a deliberate cutting off of press access?</p>","author_name":"Prospect Magazine"}