{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/650492e14e79c00011b3dc25/6a7b66ba1549db32d43f2784?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":" The Political Establishment’s Biggest Myth Is Collapsing","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/650492e14e79c00011b3dc25/1786471980302-f8bae629-b22d-438e-9fc1-6d7a6cb76507.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>The political establishment has spent years insisting that bold progressive candidates are simply too radical to win—especially in the Rust Belt. But Michigan may have just shattered that argument.</p><p><br></p><p>In recent Michigan primary victories, Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, Donovan McKinney, and William Lawrence emerged victorious despite facing enormous financial disadvantages and opposition from establishment-backed forces.</p><p><br></p><p>Outspent nearly ten-to-one, these candidates were dismissed as “unelectable” long before voters had their say. The conventional wisdom was predictable: progressive policies supposedly couldn’t win over working-class voters in the Midwest.</p><p><br></p><p>But then the votes were counted.</p><p><br></p><p>They won.</p>","author_name":"Mary Trump Media"}