{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/64cd6aee6fa6720011edc205/650203e05545620011302ec0?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"A Conversation with Heather Mac Donald","description":"<p>After the Black Lives Matter protests of 2020, prestigious American institutions, from the medical profession to the fine arts, pleaded guilty to “systemic racism.” How else can we explain why blacks are overrepresented in prisons and underrepresented in C-suites and faculty lounges, their leaders asked?</p><p><br></p><p>The official answer for those disparities is “disparate impact,” a once-obscure legal theory that is now transforming our world. Any traditional standard of behavior or achievement that impedes exact racial proportionality in any enterprise is now presumed racist. Medical school admissions tests, expectations of scientific accomplishment in the award of research grants, and the enforcement of the criminal law—all are under assault because they have a “disparate impact” on underrepresented minorities.</p><p><br></p><p><a href=\"https://manhattan.institute/person/heather-mac-donald\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Heather MacDonald</a> offers an alternative explanation for those racial disparities.</p><p><br></p><p>A <a href=\"https://www.law.berkeley.edu/research/public-law-and-policy-program/events/past-events/when-race-trumps-merit/#episode_transcript\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">transcript</a> of this episode can be found at the episode page on the <a href=\"https://www.law.berkeley.edu/research/public-law-and-policy-program/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Public Law &amp; Policy Program</a>'s website.</p>","author_name":"Public Law & Policy Program @ Berkeley"}