{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/64cd6aee6fa6720011edc205/64dd23a3d406ae001157b01d?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Groff v. DeJoy","description":"<p>This spring, the Supreme Court will hear <em>Groff v. DeJoy</em>, a case on the religious liberty rights of employees under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Chapman Law professor <a href=\"https://www.chapman.edu/our-faculty/james-phillips\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">James Phillips</a> will discuss the case, his research on the meaning of “undue hardship” under the Civil Rights Act, and what the case means for textualist theory and methodology. A<a href=\"https://www.law.berkeley.edu/research/public-law-and-policy-program/events/past-events/groff-v-dejoy/#episode_transcript\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"> transcript</a> of this episode can be found at the episode page on the <a href=\"https://www.law.berkeley.edu/research/public-law-and-policy-program/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Public Law &amp; Policy Program</a>'s website.</p>","author_name":"Public Law & Policy Program @ Berkeley"}