{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/6462652801a21a001146cc01/6462652e10dbac0011c22cd5?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"How pandemics affect our political brain","description":"<p>This week our host Rafael Behr is in conversation with <a href=\"https://www.leorzmigrod.com\">Dr Leor Zmigrod</a> about how cognitive science can help us understand how political identities are formed, and how people's ideological affiliations might affect how they respond to a national crisis.</p>\n<p>If you want to delve further into the topic </p>\n<p><strong>Reader-friendly essays</strong></p>\n<p>Zmigrod, L. (2019). The partisan brain: cognitive study suggests people on the left and right are more similar than they think. </p>\n<p><a href=\"https://theconversation.com/the-partisan-brain-cognitive-study-suggests-people-on-the-left-and-right-are-more-similar-than-they-think-123578\">https://theconversation.com/the-partisan-brain-cognitive-study-suggests-people-on-the-left-and-right-are-more-similar-than-they-think-123578</a></p>\n<p>Zmigrod, L. (2018). Brexit: how cognitive psychology helps us make sense of the vote. </p>\n<p><a href=\"https://theconversation.com/brexit-how-cognitive-psychology-helps-us-make-sense-of-the-vote-95031\">https://theconversation.com/brexit-how-cognitive-psychology-helps-us-make-sense-of-the-vote-95031</a></p>\n<p><strong>Relevant academic papers</strong></p>\n<p>Zmigrod, L. (2020). The Role of Cognitive Rigidity in Political Ideologies: Theory, Evidence, and Future Directions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 34-39. </p>\n<p>See paper here.<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.016\">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.016</a></p>\n<p>Zmigrod, L., Ebert, T., Götz, F. M., &amp; Rentfrow, J. (2020). The Psychological and Socio-political Consequences of Infectious Diseases. Retrieved from psyarxiv.com/84qcm</p>\n<p>Tybur, J. M., Inbar, Y., Aarøe, L., Barclay, P., Barlow, F. K., De Barra, M., ... &amp; Consedine, N. S. (2016). Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(44), 12408-12413 <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607398113\">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607398113</a></p>\n<p>Murray, D. R., Schaller, M., &amp; Suedfeld, P. (2013). Pathogens and politics: Further evidence that parasite prevalence predicts authoritarianism. PloS One, 8(5). <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062275\">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062275</a></p>\n<p>Kim, H. S., Sherman, D. K., &amp; Updegraff, J. A. (2016). Fear of Ebola: The influence of collectivism on xenophobic threat responses. Psychological Science, 27(7), 935-944. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616642596\">https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616642596</a></p>","author_name":"Larchmont Productions"}