{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/63d6635d45284700118ac9cf/69039a0a59814a1956be2d63?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Lump sum cancellations: what does the FCA and HMRC's clarification mean for clients?","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/63d6635d45284700118ac9cf/1762174135801-d8de9aee-c2f7-4847-8f52-0dabd830070f.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>It's more than a year since speculation ahead of last autumn's Budget led to a surge of savers raiding their pension pots in a bid to beat rumoured changes to tax-free lump sums.&nbsp;</p><p>But when no changes were announced and people sought to reverse their withdrawals, they discovered that the 30-day cancellation rule didn't apply. Or did it?</p><p>That confusion over conduct of business rules led to calls for HMRC and the FCA to clarify whether or not savers could cancel – and they've now responded.</p><p>In this episode of the Paraplanners' Assembly podcast popular Assembly expert, James Jones-Tinsley of <a href=\"https://www.barnett-waddingham.co.uk/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Barnett Waddingham</a> explains how cancellations became an issue, what the clarification means for clients, what regulatory issues the statement throws up, and what paraplanners need to know from now on.</p><p><br></p><h3>Useful links</h3><p>During the podcast, Richard mentions James's article for FT Adviser, which you can find here:</p><p><a href=\"https://www.ftadviser.com/tax-free-cash/2025/10/9/lump-sum-cancellations-members-have-been-left-vulnerable-to-misunderstanding\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Lump sum cancellations: members have been left vulnerable to misunderstanding</a></p>","author_name":"Paraplanners' Assembly"}