{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/63c70eeb61264b0011b952fe/63c70eee61264b0011b953b0?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Perspectives on Transparency in Peer Review - Parts 1-4 #PeerRevWk17","description":"<p>Parts 1-4 of our Transparency in Peer Review discussion with Tom Lang (Tom Lang Communications and Training International), Allison Leung (PLOS), David Resnik, JD, PhD (NIEHS), and Pedro Ramirez, MD (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center). In this installment we take a closer look at</p> <p> 1. What transparency means 2. How transparency benefits the researcher 3. How transparency benefits the public 4. How transparency addresses the limitations of traditional peer review</p> <p> Music: www.bensound.com</p>","author_name":"J&J Editorial"}