{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/63bc3c1bee2718001118dace/63f64d73cef8ec00119f8056?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"We Asked AI Chatbots for Their Take on #PMQs","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/63bc3c1bee2718001118dace/1674226284670-c6709015aa716e9d741748db5e579c4a.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>This experiment shows there’s a lot of artificial intelligence in <a href=\"https://rss.com/podcasts/chatting-with-chatbots/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Chatting With Chatbots</em></a><em>.</em> All the voices are 100% artificial (the advances in that field are truly astonishing).</p><p>Even the voice of the presenter – the voice of Simon Carr – is artificially generated.</p><p>The presenter’s script was written by Carr, with the contributions from the Chatbots – that is, all the Americans – are entirely from the AI programmes that are either ChatGPT or its descendants (yes, it is metastasising).</p><p>It is a little appreciated fact that Chatbots are still idiotic – however idiotic in a recognisably human way.</p><p>Will they take over professional jobs? Radio 4 presenters, newscasters, advertising copywriters, energy policy formulators?</p><p><em>They’re not there yet – though they’re certainly on the way.</em></p>","author_name":"Paul Staines, Eleanor Wheatley, Max Young"}