{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/63a30302ea5809001146d185/641ee4e7e5773700111ac124?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Lesson 6: The Ontological Argument and Pascal's Wager","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/63a30302ea5809001146d185/1679755904609-dec27a4381e9c9eed10c0abc238e4fef.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>In today's lesson, we critically talk about Anselm's ontological argument and Pascal's Wager. We explore Gaunilo's 'Lost Island' as a refute to Anselm. Our verdict is that both Anselm and Pascal have not given convincing enough arguments. Listen to the episode to find out why!</p>","author_name":"Estelle Qin and Lea Hansen"}