{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"","title":"S1E2 - Doctrinal v Empirical - Interview with Prof. Stuart Macdonald","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/639aff26567cd7001116065e/639aff2a31b12d00102a6be8.jpg?height=200","description":"Hello and welcome to the Methods Café, a podcast series focusing on socio-legal research, brought to you by researchers at Swansea University, plus guests.\n\nIn S1E2 Sara and Yvonne interview Prof. Stuart Macdonald about the distinction between doctrinal and empirical legal studies.\n\nMentioned in this episode:\n- Ashworth, A. and J. Horder (2013). Principles of criminal law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.\n- Finch, E. and V. E. Munro (2006). \"Breaking boundaries? Sexual consent in the jury room.\" Legal Studies 26(3): 303-320.\n- MacDonald, S. (2021). Text, cases and materials on criminal law. Harlow, Pearson Education Limited.\n- Macdonald, S. & Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2021). Visual Jihad: Constructing the “Good Muslim” in Online Jihadist Magazines. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 44(5), 363-386.\n- Ormerod, D. C., et al. (2020). Smith, Hogan & Ormerod's text, cases, & materials on criminal law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.\n- Simester, A. P., et al. (2016). Simester and Sullivan's Criminal law : theory and doctrine. Oxford, Hart Publishing.\n\nThe intro music is the track Last Bar Guests - Remastered by Lobo Loco (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)\n\nThis podcast is distributed under the following Creative Commons license: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). For more details visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/\n\nThis podcast is co-presented by Sara Correia and Yvonne Mcdermott Rees. It is produced and edited by Sara Correia.","author_name":"Pod by Dr. Sara Correia, Prof. Yvonne Mcdermott Rees and guests."}