{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/6374bb5cfa2a6f0011243f0e/6a0458938ef93689737032b6?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"28 Years On: Harshad Mehta’s Comeback Case Still Haunts India","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/6374bb5cfa2a6f0011243f0e/1778669685785-9cb3807b-cf3f-4dac-b2b6-9ed84844bfe5.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>Nearly three decades after Harshad Mehta’s attempted market comeback in 1998, a special SEBI court in Mumbai has convicted the Doshi brothers and several companies linked to the so-called “Damayanti Group” for failing to comply with SEBI summons.</p><p><br></p><p>But the bigger story is not just about the conviction — it is about India’s painfully slow judicial system, where cases continue for decades even after the main accused is no more.</p><p><br></p><p>In this audio, Sucheta Dalal explains:</p><p>• How Harshad Mehta allegedly used front companies to ramp up shares of BPL, Videocon and Sterlite</p><p>• The infamous 1998 market manipulation episode and BSE bailout controversy</p><p>• Why SEBI’s detailed investigation eventually collapsed at the appellate stage</p><p>• How corporate groups and enablers escaped accountability</p><p>• Why the Damayanti case still matters today</p><p>• What this means for modern investigations like the Jane Street probe</p><p><br></p><p>The case is a stark reminder that regulatory action means little without swift and final justice.</p>","author_name":"Debashis Basu & Sucheta Dalal"}