{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/6374bb5cfa2a6f0011243f0e/69971239435569254b30b0cc?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"Collateral Benefit: SC Anger & Bank Misselling Curbs","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/6374bb5cfa2a6f0011243f0e/1771508272499-8504a9c4-2143-4799-ad3b-433f694dedf5.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p>For over two decades, bank mis-selling in India has thrived under weak enforcement, empty warnings and regulatory hesitation. From toxic ULIPs and forced insurance bundling to aggressive fee-income targets, countless savers have seen their wealth quietly eroded.</p><p><br></p><p>Now, after blistering observations by the Supreme Court in the ₹58,000 crore ‘digital arrest’ fraud cases, the Reserve Bank of India has issued draft Responsible Business Conduct Amendment Directions that could finally dismantle the mis-selling machine.</p><p><br></p><p>Are these new mandates a genuine turning point — with bans on incentives, dark patterns, forced bundling and 100% refunds for mis-selling? Or will this become another case of strong words, weak enforcement?</p><p><br></p><p>In this episode, Sucheta Dalal examines whether RBI’s 2026 draft rules mark real accountability for banks — or just more regulatory tinkering after years of damage.</p>","author_name":"Debashis Basu & Sucheta Dalal"}