{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Acast","provider_url":"https://acast.com","height":250,"width":700,"html":"<iframe src=\"https://embed.acast.com/$/633c1060ee21490012381e3f/6a33f210f1ca90f587051015?\" frameBorder=\"0\" width=\"700\" height=\"250\"></iframe>","title":"E150 The Fifth Court - Mr Justice Peter Charleton: law, crime, music and the nature of evil","thumbnail_width":200,"thumbnail_height":200,"thumbnail_url":"https://open-images.acast.com/shows/633c1060ee21490012381e3f/1781789057144-da5e9ef3-f11d-461d-a60f-d7aa2dedb0a7.jpeg?height=200","description":"<p><br></p><h3><br></h3><h4>The Fifth Court marks Episode 150 with Part 1 of a wide-ranging conversation with recently retired Supreme Court judge, Peter Charleton.</h4><p><br></p><p>To mark Episode 150 of The Fifth Court, Peter Leonard BL and Mark Tottenham BL are joined by Mr Justice Peter Charleton, recently retired from the Supreme Court.</p><p>In Part 1 of this extended interview, he reflects on republicanism and nationalism, growing up near Seán Lemass and Theodore Kingsmill Moore, music, Trinity, the King’s Inns, devilling with Peter Sutherland, early years at the Bar, criminal law, defending accused persons, and the deeper questions of crime, morality and human nature.</p><p>It is a thoughtful, personal and sometimes unexpectedly funny conversation with one of Ireland’s best-known jurists.</p><p><br></p><p>Before the interview, Mark and Peter discuss three recent cases from the Decisis.ie casebook.</p><h4>The Decisis.ie case-law section is sponsored by Charlton Solicitors and Collaborative Practitioners of Dún Laoghaire.</h4><p><br></p><p>Case 1: The High Court quashed a District Court judge’s refusal to convict in speed-limit cases, holding that judges must apply the law rather than substitute their own views on whether limits are fair.</p><p>Case 2: In DPP v O’Hara, the Court of Appeal upheld a murder and burglary conviction, rejecting challenges to DNA and search-warrant evidence.</p><p>Case 3: In a Hague Convention child-abduction case, the court refused to return a child to New Zealand because of concerns about the mother’s depression and risk of relapse.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>This is Part 1 of a two-part interview. Part II will be posted next week.</strong></p><p><br></p>","author_name":"Peter Leonard BL Mark Tottenham BL"}